Dracula the Undead
==================
Seven years have passed since the power of Count Dracula was destroyed, and it
is now surely safe enough for the Harkers and Doctor Van Helsing to revisit
Transylvania and lay some old ghosts to rest. However, the ancient evil of
Dracula is awakened once more - the nightmare is not over yet.
================================================================================
Marking the centenary of Bram Stoker's novel Dracula, Freda Warrington's
sequel is written in a similar style, using letters and journal entries to
describe events. I'm full of admiration for the way the author has done this - I
think she has kept close to the spirit of the original but added her own fine
creative touches. On the whole this works well, preserving the Victorian (or
should this now be Edwardian?) atmosphere of the scenes. From the stifling gloom
of Carfax Abbey to the stark backdrop of the Carpathians, Freda Warrington
depicts the world of Dracula and his adversaries in a very authentic and
evocative way.
I thought the vampires were depicted intelligently, never as complete monsters
but as three-dimensional beings with both attractive and repellent qualities in
good measure. The living characters too, are shown in an ambivalent light, their
weaknesses and limitations displayed along with their heroism. The author thus
adds a degree of depth to the Dracula story, developing and amplifying
characters and relationships without pushing the novel beyond its boundaries as
a sequel.
Where Dracula the Undead also shines, in my opinion, is where Freda
Warrington expands the original story and enlarges on the notion of the
Scholomance, a secret undead academy deep under the mountains, where the Devil
claims his fee of one out of every ten students (Van Helsing mentions the
Scholomance very briefly in the original Dracula - blink, and you may
miss the reference.) This dusty subterranean realm is well-described - read
about it if you dare without coming over all claustrophobic...
Occasionally the epistolary style is pushed to its limits. Young
Transylvanian farmer's daughter Elena seems to absorb from Mina Harker, as if
by osmosis, both her fluent English and her urge to record everything in her
daily journal. Now that is what I call supernatural.
There are other moments where the Victorian spell is broken. The lusts of the
flesh are depicted in a way that comes across as modern, despite the attempts
to avoid being too explicit - where Bram Stoker would have hinted very
obliquely, Freda Warrington makes it abundantly clear what is going on,
painting a picture of vampiric seduction which would have scandalised Stoker's
contemporaries. One of her characters also writes about the unconscious mind
in a way that would not have been possible at the time - true, Freud would
have been formulating his theories about the id and the unconscious at about
this point in history. However, I don't think his ideas would have been in
general circulation for another half century at least.
All things considered, I think Dracula the Undead a worthy sequel to Bram
Stoker's Dracula - it is thoughtful, well-written and (mostly) congruent
with the original. Definitely worth reading.
© Alex Cull, 6th January, 2005
Top
David Whitehouse
David Whitehouse's website: http://www.starlinkuk.co.uk/david/Main_Page.html
The Sun: A Biography